[Skiboot] [RFC PATCH 1/4] ibm-fsp/firenze: uncore header file definitions
Madhavan Srinivasan
maddy at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Apr 23 13:08:01 AEST 2015
On Wednesday 22 April 2015 07:27 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 11:44 +1000, Stewart Smith wrote:
>> Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>> +/*
>>> + * Power8 has Nest Instrumentation support with which per-chip
>>> + * utilisation metrics like memory bandwidth, IO bandwidth and
>>> + * many other component metrics can be obtained. These Nest
>>> + * counters can be programmed via scoms or HW PORE Engine,
>>> + * called PORE_SLW_IMA.
>>> + *
>>> + * In the Linux kernel side, have used intel's "uncore" framework
>>> + * to plug the Power8 nest instrumentation support. For the
>>> + * consistency, have used "uncore" for in the variable/file names
>>> + * here for services provided by opal.
>>> + *
>> Why not just call it nest_pmu everywhere? I can't see anywhere that's
>> really forcing us to use uncore terminology.
> +1
>
> I'm not entirely convinced it makes sense to use the uncore stuff in Linux, but
> it definitely doesn't make sense to propagate the name down into skiboot.
>
> cheers
>
FYI.. I am redesigning to make each nest unit as a separate PMU in the
kernel side (to drop the uncore stuff). Will send out the new patch
set for both opal and kernel side soon.
Thanks for review.
Maddy
More information about the Skiboot
mailing list