[PULL] github.com/dlespiau/patchwork for-upstream

[Damien Lespiau]

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:01:21PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> WARNING! Not every patch in the pull request has a r-b or a-b tag, most
> have though. More on that below.
> 
> This pull requests has 3 main topics:
> 
>   - The re-design that has been floating around for some time now.
>     One can evaluate the state of the re-design on the freedesktop.org
>     instance:
>       http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/
>       http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/intel-gfx/list/
> 
>   - Selenium unit testing. That allows us to have full client-isde
>     in-browser unit tests. My test setup is done with Chrome and the
>     Chromedriver[1]
> 
>   - Send mails that we can't parse to settings.ADMINS for debugging
>     purposes
> 
> Now, there are a few patches in the re-design series patches that don't
> have a a-b or r-b tag. I believe this pull request is not unreasonable
> and addresses the main points Wolfram Sang and you had.
> 
> There's the freedesktop instance to forge your own idea if this work is
> in an acceptable state or not.
> 
> A couple of patches in the selenium series don't have a r-b tag either.
> With tests, it's a bit of an easier sell. They pass or not. And they do
> pass, both locally and on a headless (ie. without the distro Xorg server
> runnig but using Xvfb) CI server.

Bryce Harrington found a typo, might as well discard this pull request
for a new one I'll send right away. Sorry about that.

-- 
Damien