Patches with only renames are missing in patchwork

[Jeremy Kerr]

Hi Yann,

> We are using patchwork for the Buildroot project, and we are missing a
> few patches in the list.
> 
> We've pinpointed it to patches containing only renames.
> 
> For example, patch 1/11:
>     http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-October/079999.html

Ah, yep, patchwork won't recognise this as a patch as it doesn't have
any hunks in the @@-style format. I'll add this support to the parser
over the weekend.

Thanks for letting me know!

Cheers,


Jeremy