adding glibc to the tracked list ?

[Mike Frysinger]

On Sunday 02 June 2013 03:34:27 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 01 June 2013 02:31:27 Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > > would it be possible to have http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/ track glibc ?
> > 
> > Yep, no problem at all. I can merge the two lists into the one project,
> > but I figure you'd need to distinguish the patches somehow, right?
> 
> lemme see how the rest of the group wants to handle things.  i think they
> should be merged, but i think there should be only one list too, and i
> didn't win in that decision :).

erp, forgot about this.  people agree there should be one project that'd merge 
the lists.

> > > subscribing to those lists can be done here:
> > > 	http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/development.html
> > 
> > If you're able to manually subscribe an address to those lists (i.e.,
> > bypassing the confirmation step through the list admin interface), then
> > that makes things a little easier for me. If not, then it's not a huge
> > problem.
> 
> i don't know the answer to that.  lemme get back to you :).

there is a way to have admins manually add, but it's not exactly easy
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/attachments/20130620/a46c0230/attachment.sig>