Patch lost?

[Doug Anderson]

Wolfram,

Bizarre.  Yeah, it also shows up twice on patchwork.kernel.org:
  2150661 New          i2c: Remove unneeded xxx_set_drvdata(..., NULL) calls
  2150751 New          i2c: Remove unneeded xxx_set_drvdata(..., NULL) calls

That's in linux-arm-kernel and linux-davinci.

My initial thought was the same as yours that the reply to a
"rejected" patch was the problem.  ...I can't see anything in the
patchwork code that would do that, though.  I also tried simulating
this same thing on my own little test server.  There was no problem
getting the new patch even when it was a reply to a rejected patch.

Oh, OK.  Here's a really good guess.  The patch isn't present in the
LKML project on patchwork.kernel.org either.  Lists that the patch
were sent to:

* linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org - Not present (should be on patchwork.kernel.org)
* linux-i2c at vger.kernel.org - Not present (should be on patchwork.ozlabs.org)
* linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org - Patchwork sees (patchwork.kernel.org)
* uclinux-dist-devel at blackfin.uclinux.org - I see replies on
"http://www.mail-archive.com" but not the original
* linux-omap at vger.kernel.org - Not present (should be on patchwork.kernel.org)
* davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com - Patchwork sees
(patchwork.kernel.org)
* linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org - Patchwork sees (patchwork.ozlabs.org)


No lists serviced by vger.kernel.org got the patch.  My best guess is
that the patch had too many recipients and so looked like spam.
Perhaps I should have trimmed down the list?  Not in the habit of
sending patches that touch so many files and usually I let
"get_maintainer" decide who I should email (and use "patman" to call
get_maintainer).

In any case, thank you for applying.  :)


-Doug

---

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa at the-dreams.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a patch from Doug which is not appearing in the
> i2c-patchwork-list, although I did get it by mail via the I2C list
> directly. Interestingly, the ppc-list was also in CC and there it got
> recognized and indexed:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/220895/
>
> This patch was sent in-reply-to another patch which I already marked as
> 'rejected' but that shouldn't prevent new patches from being detected?
> Other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Wolfram
>
> PS: BTW, this patch reminds me how much I love that patchwork collects
> tags from other people automagically, really great!
> _______________________________________________
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa at the-dreams.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a patch from Doug which is not appearing in the
> i2c-patchwork-list, although I did get it by mail via the I2C list
> directly. Interestingly, the ppc-list was also in CC and there it got
> recognized and indexed:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/220895/
>
> This patch was sent in-reply-to another patch which I already marked as
> 'rejected' but that shouldn't prevent new patches from being detected?
> Other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Wolfram
>
> PS: BTW, this patch reminds me how much I love that patchwork collects
> tags from other people automagically, really great!
> _______________________________________________
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa at the-dreams.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a patch from Doug which is not appearing in the
> i2c-patchwork-list, although I did get it by mail via the I2C list
> directly. Interestingly, the ppc-list was also in CC and there it got
> recognized and indexed:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/220895/
>
> This patch was sent in-reply-to another patch which I already marked as
> 'rejected' but that shouldn't prevent new patches from being detected?
> Other ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
>    Wolfram
>
> PS: BTW, this patch reminds me how much I love that patchwork collects
> tags from other people automagically, really great!
> _______________________________________________
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork