statistics from patchworks?
Yann E. MORIN
yann.morin.1998 at free.fr
Tue Oct 9 08:12:07 EST 2012
David, Stephen, Jeremy, All,
On Monday 08 October 2012 03:57:18 Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Is it possible to get some statistics out of patchwork
> > like:
> > # of patches accepted per release
> > # of days patches reviewed
> > # of patches rejected/superseded etc?
[--SNIP--]
> Sounds like this might be useful for other folks too. Any general
> opinions on which stats would be most relevant?
For what my opinion is worth, I'd say this should not go into Patchwork.
I like Patchwork to be a 'dumb' tool that just exposes 'pending' changes
not yet acted upon.
To get those statistics would mean that a Patchwork instance be tightly
integrated with other project-management tools (eg. redmine, planner,
bugzilla...), for which the notions of 'release', 'version'... are more
meaningfull, and which already know about the project's workflow.
Instead of duplicating the notion of a 'release' (or 'version' or whatever)
to patchwork, it would be nice to:
- add hooks in Patchwork to call out to some external tools on patch
change: new patch, state change, delegate change...
- have documentation for the XMLRPC interface so that external tools
can query/update the Patchwork instance easily (eg. from a bug-tracker)
Also, such metrics would mean to have a state-flow for patches. Obviously,
all patches start in state New. But:
- what is a terminal state?
- what should happen after Under Review? After RFC? After Not Applicable?
- should Patchwork enforce a state-flow, or should each project use their
own?
I think each project will have its state-flow, some considering (eg.) Not
Applicable as being a terminal state, while others considering it just a
step before Rejected. Ditto for Superseded, and so on...
For exammple, those two state-flows for Superseded are equally valid:
New -> RFC -> Changes Requested -> Superseded
New -> RFC -> Changes Requested -> Superseded -> Rejected
Of course, we could add a single terminal state (for example):
New -> Accepted -> Closed
New -> RFC -> Changes Requested -> Superseded -> Closed
New -> Under Review -> Rejected -> Closed
Unfortunately, I think it mimics too much a bug-tracker, and Patchwork
should strive to keep minimalistic (although with a way for exchanging
with external tools, via hooks and/or XMLRPC).
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
More information about the Patchwork
mailing list