Patchwork user permissions
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
mchehab at redhat.com
Thu Mar 31 01:21:33 EST 2011
Em 30-03-2011 08:56, Alasdair G Kergon escreveu:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:28:18PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
>> However (as you say in your second point), all maintainers currently have
>> permissions to edit the state of all patches. To deal with this, it would be
>> feasible to (set by a per-project flag) allow non-lead maintainers to update
>> only the patches that are delegated to them.
>> I'm not totally convinced that this is necessary though; do you not trust your
>> sub-maintainers to refrain from editing patches that they shouldn't?
>
> Rather than going down the "we don't trust you to change this state"
> route, personally I'd prefer to see an option to display the state
> history: who changed state from what to what and when.
As I said, it is not a matter of trust/not trust, but when there are lots of sub-maintainers,
it is better to have some coordination. Yet, the idea of having a state change history
sounds very nice to me.
>
> Alasdair
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patchwork mailing list
> Patchwork at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
More information about the Patchwork
mailing list