Pull requests with patches

[Guilherme Salgado]

On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 11:37 +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Guilherme,
> 
> > Oh, indeed. Haven't noticed that.  I always use two additional levels.
> > However, I think, whitespace changes on lines that don't change
> > otherwise are best placed in separate commits -- easier to review.
> 
> For changes like this, I'd prefer to keep it consistent with the existing 
> formatting. We can revisit things later if it'd help though.

Ok

> 
> Also, as Dirk has suggested, would you be able to send your patches with 
> something like git-format-patch and git-send-email? Having a proper changelog 
> entry helps me enormously, as does including test cases where appropriate 

I've just done that, please let me know if it has everything you need.

> (don't worry about a testcase for this, but the pull request change could 
> definitely use one).

Well, this is the pull request change, so the patch I just sent includes
a testcase. :)

Cheers,

-- 
Guilherme Salgado <https://launchpad.net/~salgado>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/patchwork/attachments/20110211/25abbb49/attachment.pgp>