Merging patches

martin f krafft madduck at
Thu Feb 11 08:57:29 EST 2010

also sprach Stephen Rothwell <sfr at> [2010.02.10.1712 +1300]:
> I am pretty sure patchwork was designed to consider a patch sent
> (even in reply to another patch) as an independent thing ...

That would explain the behaviour I am seeing. I wonder if there's
an automated way to let updated patches mark the preceding one as

martin | |
due to lack of interest tomorrow has been cancelled.
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see
URL: <>

More information about the Patchwork mailing list