CI build for quanta/gbs

[Andrew Geissler]

> On May 5, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Brandon Kim <brandonkim at google.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> `gbs` machine will provide meta-google coverage, so it would be great if `gbs` could be added in addition to `gsj` instead of as a replacement.
> 
> Is there a shortage of OpenBMC CI nodes by any chance? Google has been providing 2 of the OpenBMC CI nodes, so it would be great if adding `gbs` could count towards one of those CI nodes.

Yep, google donates two servers so sounds good. I added it to our daily build of master and it looks like it hit a build issue. We can coordinate in discord if you like but once we get this figured out, I’ll add it to the main openbmc/openbmc CI job.

https://jenkins.openbmc.org/job/latest-master/231/label=docker-builder,target=gbs/console

> 
> Thank you,
> Brandon
> 
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:54 AM Patrick Venture <venture at google.com <mailto:venture at google.com>> wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 6:25 AM Andrew Geissler <geissonator at gmail.com <mailto:geissonator at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 5, 2021, at 1:26 AM, George Hung (洪忠敬) <George.Hung at quantatw.com <mailto:George.Hung at quantatw.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrew Geissler,
> > >
> > > We have ported many OpenBMC features to quanta/gbs machine (Nuvoton BMC platform) and hope it could be added to CI build, could you help add quanta/gbs machine to CI build verification ? (I'm not familiar with this, if there's anything we need to do first, please let us know)
> >
> > Hey George,
> >
> > Getting a new system into CI doesn’t have the most defined process but
> > I think in general it has to fall under one of these due to our constraints
> > in compute power for CI:
> >
> > 1) Propose an existing system in CI to replace (and the benefits of that)
> > 2) Donate a jenkins compute node to openbmc CI
> > 3) Convince the community that your system provides additional meta-*
> >     layer coverage (or some other critical benefit) that would be worth
> >     the additional hit to the existing CI infrastructure.
> >
> > We currently have a “gsj” system in CI. Would it make sense to replace
> > it with this new “gbs” machine?
> 
> Jumping on this thread to say that I'm hoping to have quanta-gbs
> support in upstream qemu shortly --- so we could also enable this as a
> Qemu CI machine.
> 
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > > Best Regards
> > > George Hung
> > >
> >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20210506/c82b191f/attachment.htm>