<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On May 5, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Brandon Kim <<a href="mailto:brandonkim@google.com" class="">brandonkim@google.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Hi Andrew,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">`gbs` machine will provide meta-google coverage, so it would be great if `gbs` could be added in addition to `gsj` instead of as a replacement.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Is there a shortage of OpenBMC CI nodes by any chance? Google has been providing 2 of the OpenBMC CI nodes, so it would be great if adding `gbs` could count towards one of those CI nodes.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>Yep, google donates two servers so sounds good. I added it to our daily build of master and it looks like it hit a build issue. We can coordinate in discord if you like but once we get this figured out, I’ll add it to the main openbmc/openbmc CI job.</div><div><br class=""></div><div><a href="https://jenkins.openbmc.org/job/latest-master/231/label=docker-builder,target=gbs/console" class="">https://jenkins.openbmc.org/job/latest-master/231/label=docker-builder,target=gbs/console</a></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thank you,</div><div class="">Brandon</div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 10:54 AM Patrick Venture <<a href="mailto:venture@google.com" class="">venture@google.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 6:25 AM Andrew Geissler <<a href="mailto:geissonator@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">geissonator@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
> > On May 5, 2021, at 1:26 AM, George Hung (洪忠敬) <<a href="mailto:George.Hung@quantatw.com" target="_blank" class="">George.Hung@quantatw.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
> ><br class="">
> > Hi Andrew Geissler,<br class="">
> ><br class="">
> > We have ported many OpenBMC features to quanta/gbs machine (Nuvoton BMC platform) and hope it could be added to CI build, could you help add quanta/gbs machine to CI build verification ? (I'm not familiar with this, if there's anything we need to do first, please let us know)<br class="">
><br class="">
> Hey George,<br class="">
><br class="">
> Getting a new system into CI doesn’t have the most defined process but<br class="">
> I think in general it has to fall under one of these due to our constraints<br class="">
> in compute power for CI:<br class="">
><br class="">
> 1) Propose an existing system in CI to replace (and the benefits of that)<br class="">
> 2) Donate a jenkins compute node to openbmc CI<br class="">
> 3) Convince the community that your system provides additional meta-*<br class="">
> layer coverage (or some other critical benefit) that would be worth<br class="">
> the additional hit to the existing CI infrastructure.<br class="">
><br class="">
> We currently have a “gsj” system in CI. Would it make sense to replace<br class="">
> it with this new “gbs” machine?<br class="">
<br class="">
Jumping on this thread to say that I'm hoping to have quanta-gbs<br class="">
support in upstream qemu shortly --- so we could also enable this as a<br class="">
Qemu CI machine.<br class="">
<br class="">
><br class="">
><br class="">
> ><br class="">
> ><br class="">
> > Thanks a lot.<br class="">
> ><br class="">
> > Best Regards<br class="">
> > George Hung<br class="">
> ><br class="">
><br class="">
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>