[PATCH 07/14] peci: Add peci-aspeed controller driver
Winiarska, Iwona
iwona.winiarska at intel.com
Sat Jul 17 07:17:24 AEST 2021
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 17:39 +0000, Williams, Dan J wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 00:04 +0200, Iwona Winiarska wrote:
> > From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > ASPEED AST24xx/AST25xx/AST26xx SoCs supports the PECI electrical
> > interface (a.k.a PECI wire).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska at intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 9 +
> > drivers/peci/Kconfig | 6 +
> > drivers/peci/Makefile | 3 +
> > drivers/peci/controller/Kconfig | 12 +
> > drivers/peci/controller/Makefile | 3 +
> > drivers/peci/controller/peci-aspeed.c | 501 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 534 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/peci/controller/Kconfig
> > create mode 100644 drivers/peci/controller/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 drivers/peci/controller/peci-aspeed.c
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 47411e2b6336..4ba874afa2fa 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -2865,6 +2865,15 @@ S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/hwmon/asc7621.rst
> > F: drivers/hwmon/asc7621.c
> >
> > +ASPEED PECI CONTROLLER
> > +M: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska at intel.com>
> > +M: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>
> > +L: linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > +L: openbmc at lists.ozlabs.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > +S: Supported
> > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/peci/peci-aspeed.yaml
> > +F: drivers/peci/controller/peci-aspeed.c
> > +
> > ASPEED PINCTRL DRIVERS
> > M: Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au>
> > L: linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/Kconfig b/drivers/peci/Kconfig
> > index 601cc3c3c852..0d0ee8009713 100644
> > --- a/drivers/peci/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/Kconfig
> > @@ -12,3 +12,9 @@ menuconfig PECI
> >
> > This support is also available as a module. If so, the module
> > will be called peci.
> > +
> > +if PECI
> > +
> > +source "drivers/peci/controller/Kconfig"
> > +
> > +endif # PECI
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/Makefile b/drivers/peci/Makefile
> > index 2bb2f51bcda7..621a993e306a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/peci/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/Makefile
> > @@ -3,3 +3,6 @@
> > # Core functionality
> > peci-y := core.o sysfs.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PECI) += peci.o
> > +
> > +# Hardware specific bus drivers
> > +obj-y += controller/
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/controller/Kconfig b/drivers/peci/controller/Kconfig
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8ddbe494677f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/controller/Kconfig
> > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +
> > +config PECI_ASPEED
> > + tristate "ASPEED PECI support"
> > + depends on ARCH_ASPEED || COMPILE_TEST
> > + depends on OF
> > + depends on HAS_IOMEM
> > + help
> > + Enable this driver if you want to support ASPEED PECI controller.
>
> Perhaps a note about how one might make this determination, or maybe a
> general recommendation that if they are building for deployment on an
> OpenBMC system say Y else say N?
Ack.
>
> > +
> > + This driver can be also build as a module. If so, the module
> > + will be called peci-aspeed.
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/controller/Makefile b/drivers/peci/controller/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..022c28ef1bf0
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/controller/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PECI_ASPEED) += peci-aspeed.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/peci/controller/peci-aspeed.c b/drivers/peci/controller/peci-aspeed.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..888b46383ea4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/peci/controller/peci-aspeed.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,501 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +// Copyright (C) 2012-2017 ASPEED Technology Inc.
> > +// Copyright (c) 2018-2021 Intel Corporation
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/peci.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/reset.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > +
> > +/* ASPEED PECI Registers */
> > +/* Control Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL 0x00
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_SAMPLING_MASK GENMASK(19, 16)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_READ_MODE_MASK GENMASK(13, 12)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_READ_MODE_COUNT BIT(12)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_READ_MODE_DBG BIT(13)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_CLK_SOURCE_MASK BIT(11)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_CLK_DIV_MASK GENMASK(10, 8)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_INVERT_OUT BIT(7)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_INVERT_IN BIT(6)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_BUS_CONTENT_EN BIT(5)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_PECI_EN BIT(4)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_PECI_CLK_EN BIT(0)
> > +
> > +/* Timing Negotiation Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_NEGOTIATION 0x04
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_MESSAGE_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_ADDRESS_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +
> > +/* Command Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD 0x08
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_PIN_MON BIT(31)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_STS_MASK GENMASK(27, 24)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_STS_ADDR_T_NEGO 0x3
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_IDLE_MASK \
> > + (ASPEED_PECI_CMD_STS_MASK | ASPEED_PECI_CMD_PIN_MON)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_FIRE BIT(0)
> > +
> > +/* Read/Write Length Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_RW_LENGTH 0x0c
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_AW_FCS_EN BIT(31)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_READ_LEN_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_WRITE_LEN_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_TAGET_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +
> > +/* Expected FCS Data Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_EXP_FCS 0x10
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_EXP_READ_FCS_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_EXP_AW_FCS_AUTO_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_EXP_WRITE_FCS_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +
> > +/* Captured FCS Data Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CAP_FCS 0x14
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CAP_READ_FCS_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CAP_WRITE_FCS_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> > +
> > +/* Interrupt Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_CTRL 0x18
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_NEGO_SEL_MASK GENMASK(31, 30)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_1ST_BIT_OF_ADDR_NEGO 0
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_2ND_BIT_OF_ADDR_NEGO 1
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_MESSAGE_NEGO 2
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_MASK GENMASK(4, 0)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_BUS_TIMEOUT BIT(4)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_BUS_CONNECT BIT(3)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_W_FCS_BAD BIT(2)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_W_FCS_ABORT BIT(1)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_CMD_DONE BIT(0)
> > +
> > +/* Interrupt Status Register */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_STS 0x1c
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_INT_TIMING_RESULT_MASK GENMASK(29, 16)
> > + /* bits[4..0]: Same bit fields in the 'Interrupt Register' */
> > +
> > +/* Rx/Tx Data Buffer Registers */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA0 0x20
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA1 0x24
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA2 0x28
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA3 0x2c
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA0 0x30
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA1 0x34
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA2 0x38
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA3 0x3c
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA4 0x40
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA5 0x44
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA6 0x48
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA7 0x4c
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA4 0x50
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA5 0x54
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA6 0x58
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA7 0x5c
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_DATA_BUF_SIZE_MAX 32
> > +
> > +/* Timing Negotiation */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_RD_SAMPLING_POINT_DEFAULT 8
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_RD_SAMPLING_POINT_MAX (BIT(4) - 1)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_DEFAULT 0
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_MAX (BIT(3) - 1)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_MSG_TIMING_DEFAULT 1
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_MSG_TIMING_MAX (BIT(8) - 1)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_ADDR_TIMING_DEFAULT 1
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_ADDR_TIMING_MAX (BIT(8) - 1)
> > +
> > +/* Timeout */
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_IDLE_CHECK_TIMEOUT_US (50 * USEC_PER_MSEC)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_IDLE_CHECK_INTERVAL_US (10 * USEC_PER_MSEC)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_DEFAULT (1000)
> > +#define ASPEED_PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_MAX (1000)
> > +
> > +struct aspeed_peci {
> > + struct peci_controller controller;
>
> Uh oh... this looks like a driver private data structure, and I know
> there's a 'struct device' allocated in @controller. /me goes to check
> ->probe()...
>
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + struct clk *clk;
> > + struct reset_control *rst;
> > + int irq;
> > + spinlock_t lock; /* to sync completion status handling */
> > + struct completion xfer_complete;
> > + u32 status;
> > + u32 cmd_timeout_ms;
> > + u32 msg_timing;
> > + u32 addr_timing;
> > + u32 rd_sampling_point;
> > + u32 clk_div;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline struct aspeed_peci *to_aspeed_peci(struct peci_controller *a)
> > +{
> > + return container_of(a, struct aspeed_peci, controller);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void aspeed_peci_init_regs(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + val = FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_CLK_DIV_MASK, ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_DEFAULT);
> > + val |= ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_PECI_CLK_EN;
> > + writel(val, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_CTRL);
> > + /*
> > + * Timing negotiation period setting.
> > + * The unit of the programmed value is 4 times of PECI clock period.
> > + */
> > + val = FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_MESSAGE_MASK, priv->msg_timing);
> > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_ADDRESS_MASK, priv->addr_timing);
> > + writel(val, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_NEGOTIATION);
> > +
> > + /* Clear interrupts */
> > + val = readl(priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_INT_STS) | ASPEED_PECI_INT_MASK;
> > + writel(val, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_INT_STS);
> > +
> > + /* Set timing negotiation mode and enable interrupts */
> > + val = FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_TIMING_NEGO_SEL_MASK, ASPEED_PECI_1ST_BIT_OF_ADDR_NEGO);
> > + val |= ASPEED_PECI_INT_MASK;
> > + writel(val, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_INT_CTRL);
> > +
> > + val = FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_SAMPLING_MASK, priv->rd_sampling_point);
> > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_CLK_DIV_MASK, priv->clk_div);
> > + val |= ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_PECI_EN;
> > + val |= ASPEED_PECI_CTRL_PECI_CLK_EN;
> > + writel(val, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_CTRL);
>
> Do these MMIO access follow a standard? I.e. is there any possibility
> to have a common / generic MMIO xfer function, but just pass in a
> different base address discovered by the PECI device rather than a
> fully custom xfer function per controller?
>
No, it's vendor specific.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int aspeed_peci_check_idle(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 cmd_sts = readl(priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_CMD);
> > +
> > + if (FIELD_GET(ASPEED_PECI_CMD_STS_MASK, cmd_sts) == ASPEED_PECI_CMD_STS_ADDR_T_NEGO)
> > + aspeed_peci_init_regs(priv);
> > +
> > + return readl_poll_timeout(priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_CMD,
> > + cmd_sts,
> > + !(cmd_sts & ASPEED_PECI_CMD_IDLE_MASK),
> > + ASPEED_PECI_IDLE_CHECK_INTERVAL_US,
> > + ASPEED_PECI_IDLE_CHECK_TIMEOUT_US);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int aspeed_peci_xfer(struct peci_controller *controller,
> > + u8 addr, struct peci_request *req)
> > +{
> > + struct aspeed_peci *priv = to_aspeed_peci(controller);
> > + unsigned long flags, timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(priv->cmd_timeout_ms);
> > + u32 peci_head;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (req->tx.len > ASPEED_PECI_DATA_BUF_SIZE_MAX ||
> > + req->rx.len > ASPEED_PECI_DATA_BUF_SIZE_MAX)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + /* Check command sts and bus idle state */
> > + ret = aspeed_peci_check_idle(priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret; /* -ETIMEDOUT */
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + reinit_completion(&priv->xfer_complete);
> > +
> > + peci_head = FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_TAGET_ADDR_MASK, addr) |
> > + FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_WRITE_LEN_MASK, req->tx.len) |
> > + FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_PECI_READ_LEN_MASK, req->rx.len);
> > +
> > + writel(peci_head, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_RW_LENGTH);
> > +
> > + memcpy_toio(priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA0, req->tx.buf,
> > + req->tx.len > 16 ? 16 : req->tx.len);
> > + if (req->tx.len > 16)
> > + memcpy_toio(priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_W_DATA4, req->tx.buf + 16,
> > + req->tx.len - 16);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "HEAD : 0x%08x\n", peci_head);
> > + print_hex_dump_bytes("TX : ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, req->tx.buf, req->tx.len);
> > +
> > + priv->status = 0;
> > + writel(ASPEED_PECI_CMD_FIRE, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_CMD);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&priv->xfer_complete, timeout);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Timeout waiting for a response!\n");
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + writel(0, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_CMD);
> > +
> > + if (priv->status != ASPEED_PECI_INT_CMD_DONE) {
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "No valid response!\n");
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + memcpy_fromio(req->rx.buf, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA0,
> > + req->rx.len > 16 ? 16 : req->rx.len);
> > + if (req->rx.len > 16)
> > + memcpy_fromio(req->rx.buf + 16, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_R_DATA4,
> > + req->rx.len - 16);
> > +
> > + print_hex_dump_bytes("RX : ", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, req->rx.buf, req->rx.len);
>
> If dynamic debug is not enabled this will be an unconditional
> printk(KERN_DEBUG.
>
> I'm ok with dev_dbg() in slow paths, but in fast paths you should look
> to tracing, or putting potentially heavyweight debug behind a
> CONFIG_X_DEBUG option. I have seen Greg is even less of a fan of
> dev_dbg().
>
Except hiding that behind CONFIG_PECI_DEBUG would require "custom"
printers (to avoid sprinkling ifdefs all over the code) and people seem
to dislike custom printers :(
If it was entirely up to me - I'd hide everything used for debug
("verbose" debug - hotpath or not) under peci_trace (that's noop if
!CONFIG_PECI_DEBUG) printer and use trace_printk under the hood.
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t aspeed_peci_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct aspeed_peci *priv = arg;
> > + u32 status;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> > + status = readl(priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_INT_STS);
> > + writel(status, priv->base + ASPEED_PECI_INT_STS);
> > + priv->status |= (status & ASPEED_PECI_INT_MASK);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * In most cases, interrupt bits will be set one by one but also note
> > + * that multiple interrupt bits could be set at the same time.
> > + */
> > + if (status & ASPEED_PECI_INT_BUS_TIMEOUT)
> > + dev_dbg_ratelimited(priv->dev, "ASPEED_PECI_INT_BUS_TIMEOUT\n");
> > +
> > + if (status & ASPEED_PECI_INT_BUS_CONNECT)
> > + dev_dbg_ratelimited(priv->dev, "ASPEED_PECI_INT_BUS_CONNECT\n");
> > +
> > + if (status & ASPEED_PECI_INT_W_FCS_BAD)
> > + dev_dbg_ratelimited(priv->dev, "ASPEED_PECI_INT_W_FCS_BAD\n");
> > +
> > + if (status & ASPEED_PECI_INT_W_FCS_ABORT)
> > + dev_dbg_ratelimited(priv->dev, "ASPEED_PECI_INT_W_FCS_ABORT\n");
>
> What's the utility of these debug statements? If they are for
> development than maybe they are ok, if they are for debug in the field
> I would make them counters and export them via debugfs, or sysfs if
> you expect to always be able to debug these events in case a kernel in
> the field has dev_dbg and debugfs disabled.
>
Development for now. Once the subsystem develops a bit more (with
additional controllers), we can think about adding counters (or
tracepoints?) that can be useful in the field but are not controller
specific.
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * All commands should be ended up with a ASPEED_PECI_INT_CMD_DONE bit
> > + * set even in an error case.
> > + */
> > + if (status & ASPEED_PECI_INT_CMD_DONE)
> > + complete(&priv->xfer_complete);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __sanitize_clock_divider(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 clk_div;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(priv->dev, "clock-divider", &clk_div);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + clk_div = ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_DEFAULT;
> > + } else if (clk_div > ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_MAX) {
> > + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Invalid clock-divider: %u, Using default: %u\n",
> > + clk_div, ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > + clk_div = ASPEED_PECI_CLK_DIV_DEFAULT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->clk_div = clk_div;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __sanitize_msg_timing(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 msg_timing;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(priv->dev, "msg-timing", &msg_timing);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + msg_timing = ASPEED_PECI_MSG_TIMING_DEFAULT;
> > + } else if (msg_timing > ASPEED_PECI_MSG_TIMING_MAX) {
> > + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Invalid msg-timing : %u, Use default : %u\n",
> > + msg_timing, ASPEED_PECI_MSG_TIMING_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > + msg_timing = ASPEED_PECI_MSG_TIMING_DEFAULT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->msg_timing = msg_timing;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __sanitize_addr_timing(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 addr_timing;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(priv->dev, "addr-timing", &addr_timing);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + addr_timing = ASPEED_PECI_ADDR_TIMING_DEFAULT;
> > + } else if (addr_timing > ASPEED_PECI_ADDR_TIMING_MAX) {
> > + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Invalid addr-timing : %u, Use default : %u\n",
> > + addr_timing, ASPEED_PECI_ADDR_TIMING_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > + addr_timing = ASPEED_PECI_ADDR_TIMING_DEFAULT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->addr_timing = addr_timing;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __sanitize_rd_sampling_point(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 rd_sampling_point;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(priv->dev, "rd-sampling-point", &rd_sampling_point);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + rd_sampling_point = ASPEED_PECI_RD_SAMPLING_POINT_DEFAULT;
> > + } else if (rd_sampling_point > ASPEED_PECI_RD_SAMPLING_POINT_MAX) {
> > + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Invalid rd-sampling-point: %u, Use default : %u\n",
> > + rd_sampling_point, ASPEED_PECI_RD_SAMPLING_POINT_DEFAULT);
> > +
> > + rd_sampling_point = ASPEED_PECI_RD_SAMPLING_POINT_DEFAULT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->rd_sampling_point = rd_sampling_point;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __sanitize_cmd_timeout(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + u32 timeout;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = device_property_read_u32(priv->dev, "cmd-timeout-ms", &timeout);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + timeout = ASPEED_PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_DEFAULT;
> > + } else if (timeout > ASPEED_PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_MAX || timeout == 0) {
> > + dev_warn(priv->dev, "Invalid cmd-timeout-ms: %u, Use default: %u\n",
> > + timeout, ASPEED_PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_DEFAULT);
> > +
>
> For all of the same pattern like this above I would say "falling back
> to: %u" otherwise "Use default" sounds like an action the platform
> owner is expected to take.
>
Agree.
> Also, if the driver is correcting the issue does the log need to be
> spammed with a warning? Is this 'info' or 'debug'?
It suggests that device tree for that platform is incompatible with the
schema ("make dtbs_check" wasn't done).
For that reason I would prefer to keep it as a warning.
>
> > + timeout = ASPEED_PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_DEFAULT;
> > + }
> > +
> > + priv->cmd_timeout_ms = timeout;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void aspeed_peci_device_property_sanitize(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + __sanitize_clock_divider(priv);
> > + __sanitize_msg_timing(priv);
> > + __sanitize_addr_timing(priv);
> > + __sanitize_rd_sampling_point(priv);
> > + __sanitize_cmd_timeout(priv);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void aspeed_peci_disable_clk(void *data)
> > +{
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(data);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int aspeed_peci_init_ctrl(struct aspeed_peci *priv)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(priv->dev, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> > + return dev_err_probe(priv->dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk), "Failed to get clk source\n");
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(priv->dev, aspeed_peci_disable_clk, priv->clk);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + aspeed_peci_device_property_sanitize(priv);
> > +
> > + aspeed_peci_init_regs(priv);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int aspeed_peci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct aspeed_peci *priv;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + priv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> ..."uh oh" from above confirmed. devm allocation lifetime and 'struct
> device' lifetime are not compatible.
>
> You can trigger use after free bugs by turning on
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE.
>
> devm can be used to automatically unregister the peci_controller
> device. The flow would be something like:
>
> priv = devm_kzalloc(..., sizeof(*priv), ...);
> controller = peci_controller_alloc(...);
> if (IS_ERR(controller))
> return PTR_ERR(controller);
> rc = devm_peci_controller_add(...)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> This arranges for the peci_controller_alloc() to be undone by
> put_device() in all cases. Internal to peci_controller_alloc() is
> typical goto unwind allocation error handling.
Yeah, it will be taken into account during refactoring that you
suggested in the previous patch review.
>
> > + if (!priv)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + dev_set_drvdata(priv->dev, priv);
> > +
> > + priv->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
> > +
> > + priv->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (!priv->irq)
> > + return priv->irq;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, priv->irq, aspeed_peci_irq_handler,
> > + 0, "peci-aspeed-irq", priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + init_completion(&priv->xfer_complete);
> > + spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + priv->controller.xfer = aspeed_peci_xfer;
> > +
> > + priv->rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rst)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing or invalid reset controller entry\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->rst);
> > + }
> > + reset_control_deassert(priv->rst);
> > +
> > + ret = aspeed_peci_init_ctrl(priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return peci_controller_add(&priv->controller, priv->dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int aspeed_peci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct aspeed_peci *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + peci_controller_remove(&priv->controller);
> > + reset_control_assert(priv->rst);
> > +
>
> It's odd to have devm in the probe path and still publish a remove
> handler, i.e. why not handle controller removal and reset via devm?
> The example above with devm_peci_controller_add() already assumes
> peci_controller_remove is triggered by devm, reset assert can be
> managed the same way.
I think the pattern is pretty common for subsystems that don't have
devres support. Drivers use devres for resources that support it, and
go with regular "manual" remove for everything else.
But I'm fine with using devres in PECI.
>
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id aspeed_peci_of_table[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-peci", },
> > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-peci", },
> > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-peci", },
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, aspeed_peci_of_table);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver aspeed_peci_driver = {
> > + .probe = aspeed_peci_probe,
> > + .remove = aspeed_peci_remove,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "peci-aspeed",
> > + .of_match_table = aspeed_peci_of_table,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(aspeed_peci_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>");
>
> Same comments about MODULE_AUTHOR from patch 6, i.e. make sure this is
> not duplicating what MAINTAINERS and git log handle.
>
> I'll pause here until you've had a chance to consider fixes to the
> devm vs 'struct device' lifetime issue.
Sure, thank you
-Iwona
>
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ASPEED PECI driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > +MODULE_IMPORT_NS(PECI);
>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list