Gerrit owners plugin coming

[Thang Q. Nguyen]

On 1/29/21 00:23, Ed Tanous wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 6:08 PM Thang Q. Nguyen
> <thang at os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>> On 1/28/21 00:09, Ed Tanous wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 4:02 AM Alexander Amelkin <a.amelkin at yadro.com> wrote:
>>>> 26.01.2021 00:26, Ed Tanous пишет:
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:23 AM Ed Tanous <ed at tanous.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Over the last few weeks, we've been slowly getting the gerrit owners
>>>>>> plugin deployed and tested, and got the OWNERS files merged into their
>>>>>> respective meta layers.
>>>>> These changes are live.  Any commits to the individual meta layers can
>>>>> now be submitted directly to openbmc/openbmc now.  If there's anything
>>>>> broken about the new workflow, or anything unexpected happens in your
>>>>> workflow, please let me know on discord and we'll try to get it
>>>>> resolved.
>>>> Does this mean that meta-<vendor> directories are not subtrees anymore
>>>> and respective repositories are now obsolete and can (will?) be dropped?
>>>>
>>> The intent was to make them read-only in case someone was relying on
>>> them directly.
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> Any problem with meta-* repos which have not been integrated into the
>> main openbmc repo? For example, meta-ampere, meta-fii.
> They'll need a review pushed to openbmc/openbmc by someone with an
> interest in them.  Make sure to include an OWNERS file in them.
I requested the meta-ampere for Ampere Computing's Mt.Jade platform 
support and I requested to integrate meta-ampere to openbmc/openbmc 
before. There is OWNERS file added to the repository.
>> And with the change, the new change will be submitted into
>> openbmc/openbmc repos in gerrit instead of openbmc/meta-*?
> correct.
>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Alexander.
>>>>