Change 27956 dbus-sensors PSUSensor appears to break Entity ID

Josh Lehan krellan at google.com
Fri Jan 17 10:44:53 AEDT 2020


Nice, thanks for your fast follow-up! Here is the created issue:

https://github.com/openbmc/dbus-sensors/issues/3

Thanks!
Josh

Josh Lehan | Software Engineer | krellan at google.com | +1 650-733-8941



On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:35 AM James Feist <james.feist at linux.intel.com>
wrote:

> On 1/15/20 6:00 PM, Josh Lehan wrote:
> > Hello there.
> >
> > A recent change to dbus-sensors, 27956 on Gerrit, appears to have
> > introduced a difference which breaks the Entity ID field.
> >
> > Alex Qiu has written what the symptom is, and I traced through the code.
> > Both findings are written as comments, to that change on Gerrit.
> >
> > I'm open to suggestions on how to resolve this. There are probably many
> > people using the PSUSensor program in different ways.
> >
> > I am curious as to the behavior Intel was seeing in their project. There
> > must be a difference in the way we are using the PSUSensor program, in
> > which the way we're using it sees this as a breakage, but Intel sees
> > this as a fix. Any details that can be provided?
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Thanks for the investigation. Would you mind creating an issue?
>
> I think this has to do with Redfish and the power schema. Upon looking
> closer, I think this patch should be reverted, and the fix be applied to
> Redfish to distinguish between power sensors and other types of sensors.
>
> I'd be fine if you created a revert as well if there is an issue to
> point to with your research.
>
> Thanks
>
> -James
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Josh
> >
> > Josh Lehan | Software Engineer |krellan at google.com
> > <mailto:krellan at google.com> | +1 650-733-8941 <(650)%20733-8941>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20200116/d1a342ee/attachment.htm>


More information about the openbmc mailing list