Request for Feedback :: Time Mode setting in timemanager

[Patrick Williams]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:01:21AM +0800, Lei YU wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:37 AM Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:38:56AM +0530, Vishwanatha Subbanna wrote:
> > > Proposal for now is to:  *Remove the support for TimeOwner*. It will be as good as BOTH
> >
> > "TimeOwner = BOTH" today creates two virtual clocks from the physical
> > RTC by implementing the Host clock as an offset from the BMC clock,
> > doesn't it?  Is that going to continue to be the functionality with your
> > proposal or are you reverting back to a single physical clock where both
> > Host and BMC can update?
> 
> "TimeOnwer = BOTH" does not creates two virtual clocks, "TimeOwner =
> Split" does.
> "BOTH" effectively enables both BMC and the Host to set the "single" clock.

Got it, my mistake.

-- 
Patrick Williams
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20200224/182ba4f6/attachment.sig>