Default Gateway for a system v/s Default gateway per Interface
Ratan Gupta
ratagupt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Apr 27 21:11:15 AEST 2020
Thanks Patrick, William for sharing the feedbacks
I will start working on the changes.
On 4/24/20 11:15 PM, William Kennington wrote:
> Sounds good to me, we have needed this for a long time because the
> current gateway configuration breaks our v6 stack with multiple NICs.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:21 AM Patrick Williams <patrick at stwcx.xyz
> <mailto:patrick at stwcx.xyz>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:36:26PM +0530, Ratan Gupta wrote:
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS
> Window irtt
> > Iface
> > 0.0.0.0 19.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> > eth0
> > 0.0.0.0 10.10.10.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> > eth1
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Kernel will first try using the default gateway having higher
> metric
> > value and then fall back to the lower.
>
> I'm not seeing us with an interface to adjust the metric for an
> interface. I think we need to add that at the same time?
>
Not now, As per my testing if metric value is not defined and both the
routes
having same metric then kernel tries one after other. We can bring the
metric
later.
> Otherwise, I
> don't think we have a way to specify which interface
> outside-the-subnet
> should go (vs today we can set the default-gateway to the desired
> interface's gateway).
> --
> Patrick Williams
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20200427/5ebade62/attachment.htm>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list