Access Intel ME IPMB from BMC
James Feist
james.feist at linux.intel.com
Sat Apr 25 04:49:28 AEST 2020
On 4/23/2020 4:10 PM, Vijay Khemka wrote:
>
>
> On 4/23/20, 2:00 PM, "James Feist" <james.feist at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/23/2020 11:59 AM, Vijay Khemka wrote:
> > As i2c slave mqueue driver is not upstreamed and with already having
> > same functionality in ipmb-dev driver which is already in uostream
> > kernel, I don’t see any reason to use i2c slave mqueue driver. I highly
> > incourage people to use ipmb-dev driver with latest ipmbbridge. If there
> > are any issues, please let us know.
>
> One issue we ran into is having MCTP and IPMB on the same bus. IPMB
> driver can't handle MCTP traffic, where the mqueue could handle both.
> Kernel also doesn't allow multiple slave addresses on one bus. Haven't
> found a good solution to this one yet.
>
> I don't see much difference in mqueue and ipmb driver code wise. If
> something has changed in current mqueue driver to support mctp traffic
> then we should try to add these in ipmb driver as well.
>
> I can't comment much as I have not seen current mqueue driver.
mqueue is protocol agnostic and allows userspace to handle the protocol.
Nothing changed with it. It's a difference in design.
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > -Vijay
> >
>
>
>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list