Re: [PATCH linux dev-5.3 13/13] mtd: spi-nor: aspeed: add support for AST2600 training
Andrew Jeffery
andrew at aj.id.au
Thu Sep 26 12:14:01 AEST 2019
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, at 22:12, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Would prefer some description here, this patch gets complex. At least for me,
probably because I'm not familiar with the flash training routine.
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg at kaod.org>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/aspeed-smc.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/aspeed-smc.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/aspeed-smc.c
> index 48164d819a37..e9bc89755912 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/aspeed-smc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/aspeed-smc.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ static u32 aspeed_smc_segment_end_ast2600(
> static u32 aspeed_smc_segment_reg_ast2600(
> struct aspeed_smc_controller *controller, u32 start, u32 end);
>
> +static int aspeed_smc_calibrate_reads_ast2600(struct aspeed_smc_chip
> *chip,
> + u32 hdiv, const u8 *golden_buf, u8 *test_buf);
> +
> static const struct aspeed_smc_info fmc_2600_info = {
> .maxsize = 256 * 1024 * 1024,
> .nce = 3,
> @@ -149,7 +152,11 @@ static const struct aspeed_smc_info fmc_2600_info
> = {
> .we0 = 16,
> .ctl0 = 0x10,
> .timing = 0x94,
> + .hclk_mask = 0xf0fff0ff,
> + .hdiv_max = 2,
> .set_4b = aspeed_smc_chip_set_4b,
> + .optimize_read = aspeed_smc_optimize_read,
> + .calibrate = aspeed_smc_calibrate_reads_ast2600,
> .segment_start = aspeed_smc_segment_start_ast2600,
> .segment_end = aspeed_smc_segment_end_ast2600,
> .segment_reg = aspeed_smc_segment_reg_ast2600,
> @@ -162,7 +169,11 @@ static const struct aspeed_smc_info spi_2600_info
> = {
> .we0 = 16,
> .ctl0 = 0x10,
> .timing = 0x94,
> + .hclk_mask = 0xf0fff0ff,
> + .hdiv_max = 2,
> .set_4b = aspeed_smc_chip_set_4b,
> + .optimize_read = aspeed_smc_optimize_read,
> + .calibrate = aspeed_smc_calibrate_reads_ast2600,
> .segment_start = aspeed_smc_segment_start_ast2600,
> .segment_end = aspeed_smc_segment_end_ast2600,
> .segment_reg = aspeed_smc_segment_reg_ast2600,
> @@ -1101,6 +1112,63 @@ static int aspeed_smc_optimize_read(struct
> aspeed_smc_chip *chip,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#define TIMING_DELAY_DI BIT(3)
> +#define TIMING_DELAY_HCYCLE_MAX 5
> +
> +static int aspeed_smc_calibrate_reads_ast2600(struct aspeed_smc_chip
> *chip, u32 hdiv,
> + const u8 *golden_buf, u8 *test_buf)
> +{
> + struct aspeed_smc_controller *controller = chip->controller;
> + const struct aspeed_smc_info *info = controller->info;
> + int hcycle;
> + u32 shift = (hdiv - 2) << 3;
> + u32 mask = ~(0xfu << shift);
> + u32 fread_timing_val = 0;
> +
> + for (hcycle = 0; hcycle <= TIMING_DELAY_HCYCLE_MAX; hcycle++) {
> + int delay_ns;
> + bool pass = false;
> +
> + fread_timing_val &= mask;
> + fread_timing_val |= hcycle << shift;
> +
> + /* no DI input delay first */
> + writel(fread_timing_val, controller->regs + info->timing);
> + pass = aspeed_smc_check_reads(chip, golden_buf, test_buf);
> + dev_dbg(chip->nor.dev,
> + " * [%08x] %d HCLK delay, DI delay none : %s",
> + fread_timing_val, hcycle, pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
> + if (pass)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Add DI input delays */
> + fread_timing_val &= mask;
> + fread_timing_val |= (TIMING_DELAY_DI | hcycle) << shift;
> +
> + for (delay_ns = 0; delay_ns < 0x10; delay_ns++) {
> + fread_timing_val &= ~(0xf << (4 + shift));
> + fread_timing_val |= delay_ns << (4 + shift);
> +
> + writel(fread_timing_val, controller->regs + info->timing);
> + pass = aspeed_smc_check_reads(chip, golden_buf, test_buf);
> + dev_dbg(chip->nor.dev,
> + " * [%08x] %d HCLK delay, DI delay %d.%dns : %s",
> + fread_timing_val, hcycle, (delay_ns + 1)/2,
> + (delay_ns + 1) & 1 ? 5 : 5, pass ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
> + /*
> + * TODO: This is optimistic. We should look
> + * for a working interval and save the middle
> + * value in the read timing register.
> + */
> + if (pass)
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* No good setting for this frequency */
> + return -1;
> +}
> +
> static int aspeed_smc_chip_setup_finish(struct aspeed_smc_chip *chip)
> {
> struct aspeed_smc_controller *controller = chip->controller;
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>
More information about the openbmc
mailing list