Out-of-band NIC management
Supreeth.Venkatesh at arm.com
Thu Jul 18 02:47:25 AEST 2019
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 16:45 -0500, Ben Wei wrote:
> Hi all,
> Would anyone be interested in collaborating on out-of-band NIC
> management and monitoring?
Yes. If there is an existing implementation that can be
leveraged/extended within OpenBMC, it will be fantastic.
> DMTF has as a NCSI spec (
> ), that defines a standard interface for BMCs to manage NICs.
I assume that NC-SI over MCTP Binding
will also be targeted. Correct?
Jeremy was working on MCTP, so we should collaborate with Jeremy and
> And in kernel 5.x , NC-SI driver supports Netlink interface for
> communicating with userspace processes.
> I'm thinking adding the following tools to OpenBMC as a starting
> point and build form there:
> 1. A command line utility (e.g. ncsi-util) to send raw NC-SI
> commands, useful for debugging and initial NIC bring up,
> For example:
> ncsi-util -eth0 -ch 0 <raw NC-SI command>
> We can further extend this command line tool to support other
> management interfaces, e.g sending MCTP or PLDM commands to NIC.
> 2. A daemon running on OpenBMC (e.g ncsid) monitoring NIC
> status, for example:
> a. Query and log NIC capability and current parameter
> b. Periodically check NIC link status, re-initialize NC-SI
> link if NIC is unreachable, log the status
> c. Enable and monitor NIC Asynchronous Event Notifications
> i. such as Link Status Change, Configuration
> required, Host driver status change
> ii. there are OEM-specific AENs that BMC may also
> enable and monitor
> iii. either log these events, and/or performs
> recovery and remediation as needed
> d. Additional monitoring such as
> i. temperature (not in standard NC-SI command yet),
> ii. firmware version, update event, network traffic
> Both the CLI tool and the monitoring daemon can either communicate to
> kernel driver directly via Netlink independently, or we can have the
> ncsi daemon acting as command serializer to kernel and other user
> space processes.
> These are just some of my initial thoughts and I'd love to hear some
> feedback if these would be useful to OpenBMC.
> If anyone in interested in collaborate on these we can discuss more
> on features and design details.
I am interested in collaborating on the design details.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openbmc