linux kernel compiler warnings ignored

Oskar Senft osk at google.com
Sat Apr 27 01:25:08 AEST 2019


Thank you!

Is there an "easy" way to bake the resulting kernel image into an image for
the SPI flash chip?

I often make kernel-only changes and usually run through the whole process
of committing to a local repo, then running bit bake and waiting for all
the other stuff it also does. If there was a way to just build the kernel
and replace the one in the SPI flash image with the new one, that would be
awesome.

Oskar.

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 10:15 AM Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, at 08:01, Patrick Venture wrote:
> > I'm getting feedback from a patchset I sent upstream that there are
> > compiler warnings.  Which surprised me because my OpenBMC builds with
> > those patches don't complain.  I imagine therefore we have them
> > silenced and was curious where we silence them.
>
> How are you building the kernel?
>
> I strongly recommend you build kernels directly from the kernel source
> tree rather than using bitbake, if that's what you're doing.
>
> In the kernel source tree, do:
>
> $ export ARCH=arm
> $ export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi-
> $ make aspeed_g5_defconfig
> $ make W=1 -j$(nproc)
>
> This exports are from memory, ymmv.
>
> In addition to giving you more output than Greg is after, it has a much
> lower write/compile/test latency.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Andrew
>
> >
> > Patrick
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/openbmc/attachments/20190426/f3bd5edb/attachment.htm>


More information about the openbmc mailing list