tiny package --

Andrew Jeffery andrew at aj.id.au
Mon Sep 10 10:13:20 AEST 2018

On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, at 01:31, Patrick Venture wrote:
> Brad;
> I was looking at publishing a single-header file from a package
> containing only that header file.  In this case, "oemgoogle.hpp" into
> the same place that phosphor-host-ipmid installs its headers so that
> any google-ipmi-* packages could store their OEM numbers in one file
> (upstream).
> Downstream we store that file in our phosphor-host-ipmid mirror.
> The advice I seek is -- it doesn't seem worth creating a separate
> repository for one file, but I know it's a frowned upon practice to
> store code in the bitbake repository -- but in this case, I feel like
> it may be appropriate.  Does that make sense?
> I'm thinking:
> meta-google/recipes-google/ipmi/google-ipmi-header.bb
> meta-google/recipes-google/ipmi/google-ipmi-header/configure.ac
> meta-google/recipes-google/ipmi/google-ipmi-header/Makefile.am
> meta-google/recipes-google/ipmi/google-ipmi-header/oemgoogle.hpp

I think it makes sense, so +1 from me.


More information about the openbmc mailing list