[RFC PATCH linux dev-4.13 1/3] soc: aspeed: Miscellaneous control interfaces

[Eugene.Cho at dell.com]

>> An observation: It's the only thing inside this file that is aspeed 
>> specific. If not for the name, it could be generic code.

>I agree, hence some of the bullet points in the cover letter. But it's name and location was also partly driven by Arnd's suggestion that we stick the junk in drivers/soc, and it felt a bit weird not to use aspeed in the name >given the convention there.

Just FYI - We've got the same exact problem on Nuvoton (just odds and ends in misc registers). Does this imply we will need a soc/npcm750 which also does the exact same thing?

I'm guessing making it too generic - will make it harder to get upstream?