Two Google-Origin Daemons

[Patrick Venture]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 5:44 AM Brad Bishop <bradleyb at fuzziesquirrel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 28, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Patrick Venture <venture at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Brad;
> >
> > We have two daemons (to start with) that we'd like to send up.  So my
> > question is, should we put these to live under
> > openbmc/google-{reponame} or google/{reponame} and point the recipe in
> > meta-google to google/ or openbmc/ ?
> >
> > I'm inclined to say the code can live under openbmc/ so that others
> > can see it, and because it uses openbmc stuff.
>
> This is fine by me.  It would be nice to know what they do.  I may have
> an opinion on what they are called (the repositories).
>
> This highlights a concern I have.  The project could use some formal
> criteria for hosting code on openbmc.  Then we could evaluate new
> repository requests based on those criteria.  Open to thoughts on that...

I'd be ok with announcement emails that spawn discussion leading to
the decision.  Some will be no-brainers, while others may surprise.
Ultimately, I have five things that I'd like to upstream in the coming
weeks, and two are very google, and the other three could go either
way.

>
> >
> > Patrick