[PATCH linux dev-4.10 1/1] arm: dts: Add Wfp BMC Machine
Joel Stanley
joel at jms.id.au
Tue Nov 14 12:06:05 AEDT 2017
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:32 AM, James Feist
<james.feist at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 03:43 PM, Joel Stanley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:16 AM, James Feist
>> <james.feist at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2017 11:36 PM, Joel Stanley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the same as aspeed-bmc-opp-flash-layout.dtsi. Is there any
>>>> reason we can't reuse that file?
>>>>
>>>
>>> We could, however it seems a bit awkward to have this platform lumped in
>>> with open power, as it is not an open power platform. Also if we decide
>>> to
>>> modify the flash layout then this would have to be done anyways. I am
>>> fine
>>> either way, it just seemed to make more sense having them separate.
>>> Another
>>> alternative would be to rename aspeed-bmc-opp-flash-layout.dtsi to
>>> something
>>> more openbmc related instead of openpower.
>>
>>
>> I'd be happy to accept a patch that renames it. I was never a fan of
>> the opp string in the device tree files; it's namespacing that
>> upstream dts and dtsi tend not to have.
>>
> Does aspeed-bmc-phosphor-flash-layout.dtsi sound reasonable?
It's a bit verbose. How about openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi ?
More information about the openbmc
mailing list