[PATCH] Avoid use of uninitialised spinlock in EEH.

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 17:04 -0600, linas wrote:
> You can regain most of that performance hit by reordering, 
> so that instead of 
> 
> > -#define EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val, type)        ((val) == (type)~0)
> > +#define EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val, type)        (eeh_subsystem_enabled && (val) == (type)~0)
> 
> one has
> 
> #define EEH_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val, type)   (((val) == (type)~0) &&
> eeh_subsystem_enabled)

Agreed. I actually thought precisely the same thing as I glanced at the
attached email again when I sent it. Do you want me to submit a patch
like that?

-- 
dwmw2