asm-ppc/page.h vs asm-powerpc/page.h (fwd)

[Kumar Gala]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:01:43 -0600 (CST)
From: Kumar Gala <galak at gate.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
Cc: michael at ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org,
     linuxppc64 at gate.crashing.org
Subject: asm-ppc/page.h vs asm-powerpc/page.h

Guys, what's going on here.

Why haven't we removed asm-ppc/page.h?

When I build ARCH=powerpc I get asm-powerpc/page.h, which doesn't build on 
85xx since page_to_virt is missing.

Any reason we are keeping around asm-ppc/page.h and causing this 
confusion?

- kumar

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev