Hugepage COW
David Gibson
david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
Thu Mar 17 14:48:44 EST 2005
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:01:36PM -0600, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 01:03, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 07:18:25AM -0800, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > Hi David. I've been trying out your consolidation patch and everything
> > > seems to be working great for me too on ppc64.
> >
> > That's good to know. Did you test on anything other than ppc64?
> > That's where the patch really needs testing.
>
> I just want to report a testing ACK on i386 for both the consolidation
> patch and the COW patch. Is there anything holding these back from
> mainline? Let me know if I can do anything else to help out. Once my
> hugetlb tests make it onto ABAT, I'll be able to test x86_64 and ia64 as
> well.
As far as the consolidation patch goes, lack of testing was the main
objective reason for holding back. So if you could test on x86_64 and
ia64 too, that would be great. wli had some objections to the patch
when I first posted which I didn't and don't really understand, and
from conversations with akpm, I'm certainly thinking of just
re-sending it.
COW will be a bit more of a political shitfight, I suspect. I'd like
to at least hold off until the consolidation is merged, which makes
the COW much easier. We'll also need to implement the necessary
arch-hooks for COW on every platform. Speaking of which, did you
implement the i386 hooks? I thought I only did COW for ppc64, so far,
although on top of the consolidation patch the amount of arch code is
vastly reduced.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist. NOT _the_ _other_ _way_
| _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson
More information about the Linuxppc64-dev
mailing list