RAS uses RTAS arguments that might be above RMO/4GB

[Olof Johansson]

Olof Johansson wrote:

> Does attached patch look sane?  I'm not 100% sure what context it might
> be called from, but I figured doing local structure copies is safer than
> holding the lock over log_error().

DOH, that doesn't even build. Change "spin_lock log_lock" to "spinlock_t
log_lock".


-Olof

--
Olof Johansson                                        Office: 4F005/905
Linux on Power Development                            IBM Systems Group
Email: olof at austin.ibm.com                          Phone: 512-838-9858
All opinions are my own and not those of IBM

** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/