hvc console sleep under spinlock

Olof Johansson olof at austin.ibm.com
Fri Oct 31 14:40:07 EST 2003

Nathan Lynch wrote:
>> Would something like this suffice?  I haven't tested it with the
>> spinlock debug patch, but I have booted and run it with no apparent
>> problems.
> Er, ignore that earlier patch; it introduces an unused variable and a
> memory leak.  How about this one?

The return value of kmalloc() is never verified to be non-NULL.

Besides that it looks good to me.


Olof Johansson                                        Office: 4E002/905
pSeries Linux Development                             IBM Systems Group
Email: olof at austin.ibm.com                          Phone: 512-838-9858
All opinions are my own and not those of IBM

** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

More information about the Linuxppc64-dev mailing list