[PATCH] clean up compiler warnings in 2.5 bk

Paul Mackerras paulus at samba.org
Fri Nov 14 08:00:42 EST 2003

Nathan Lynch writes:

> I prefer it because use of NULL implies that np->node is a pointer,
> which it is not.  The compiler's warning seems valid to me.

Ah, yes, my mistake.  OK, then your change is fine.  I was thinking of
ppc32, where a phandle is a void *.


** Sent via the linuxppc64-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

More information about the Linuxppc64-dev mailing list