Linux 2.6 and uboot

Gary Kenaley gkenaley at echelon.com
Sat Apr 14 06:25:17 EST 2007


I found that when trying to build kernel 2.6.19.2 with the ELDK 4.1, and
run it on an MPC8349EMDS with u-boot 1.1.3, I had to use ARCH=ppc.
ARCH=powerpc would immediately hang. The different architectures use
different default kernel configuration files for the same board.

But now I am unable to get USB and MTD to work on the board, and am
wondering if ARC=ppc is still a viable choice on kernels newer than
about 2.6.15, or whether it lacks the best driver support. Could someone
please offer a recommendation on this issue?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+gkenaley=echelon.com at ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+gkenaley=echelon.com at ozlabs.org] On
> Behalf Of Kumar Gala
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:18 PM
> To: Clint Thomas
> Cc: linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 and uboot
> 
> 
> On Apr 13, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Clint Thomas wrote:
> 
> > Is there any correlation between the version of U-boot to use on a
> > board
> > and the version of the Linux kernel you plan to use? Current I'm
> > running
> > U-boot 1.1.2 with kernel 2.4.26 on my MPC85xx board, but i'm trying
to
> > migrate to the latest 2.6 kernel. I am getting a kernel hang at boot
> > when it registers socket family 17, so I was wondering if it might
> > have
> > to do with u-boot before exploring the debug route.
> 
> That's an odd place to hang. Which 2.6 kernel are you using?  Also
> are you using arch/ppc or arch/powerpc?
> 
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded



More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list