[PATCH] Add support for lite5200b board.

John Rigby jcrigby at gmail.com
Fri Jan 27 08:29:18 EST 2006


On 1/25/06, Sylvain Munaut <tnt at 246tnt.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Should apply fine on vanilla. My suggestion for now is take vanilla,
> apply this patch, then the 2-3 patch from Andrey for BestComm and stuff.


I was working on getting bestcomm and fec working, but forward porting
my old 2.6.10 code to current is turning out to be more difficult than I
expected.
If you already have working code then I'll stop working on them.

Where are these patches?  I'm new to this list so I don't have much history.
Would I find these patches in the archive?


I haven't gotten around setup a git tree ... anyone know a good tutorial
> not only on how to checkout stuff but how to well manage a remote
> repository for publishing ?
>
>
> >> Looks good. But two comments :
> >>
> >> * Isn't a modif to the arch/ppc/platform/Makefile missing ?
> >> * What's the "cs-1" you turn on there :
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_LITE5200B
> >>> +    /* turn on cs1 */
> >>> +    port_config |= 0x80000000;
> >>> +#endif
> >>>
> > What fix this ?
>
> It's to activate the second bank of DDR-SDRAM. However, I find that's
> the job of the bootloader. Fully initializing the memory subsystem is
> one of the few things the kernel expects, so I probably won't include
> this.



I agree completely.

My politics (at least for the 5200 stuff) is the boot loader should :
> * Init memory stuff like it wants (at least boot flash & all dynamic
> mem). The init of some static chipselect could be done in platform init.
> * Put the pin muxes & stuff to the "safest" mode (that is for example
> GPIO Input) execpt for what it requires for boot (like a console PSC and
> ethernet). All other pin mux (defnitive one) should be done in platform
> init depending on the board.
>
>
> >>     I couldn't find the schema / real-doc of the Lite5200b,
> >> is this available somewhere on-line ?
> >>
> > Sylvain, I don't know if there are some Lite5200b doc on line, but I
> > have the schematics and could send to you or to anyone who want it.
>
> Yes, please, I'd appreciate an early copy.
> John sent the link to the User Manual but the latter hasn't the full
> schematic.
>
>
>
> Sylvain
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded at ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/attachments/20060126/8aecda39/attachment.htm 


More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list