what is the protocol for getting patches into the tree?
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Oct 6 01:02:19 EST 2004
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:24:24AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
[snip]
> what follows is (for ... what ... the third time?), an attempt to
> just extend the smc_uart struct in commproc.h to add a relocation
> pointer. there's no reason i can think of why this shouldn't be
> applied.
Is this the same patch / idea that I've seen both Wolfgang and Dan have
a number of comments on, or something different? If it is the same,
have their issues been cleared in this version of the patch? Thanks.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list