what is the protocol for getting patches into the tree?

Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Oct 6 01:02:19 EST 2004

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:24:24AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   what follows is (for ... what ... the third time?), an attempt to 
> just extend the smc_uart struct in commproc.h to add a relocation 
> pointer.  there's no reason i can think of why this shouldn't be 
> applied.

Is this the same patch / idea that I've seen both Wolfgang and Dan have
a number of comments on, or something different?  If it is the same,
have their issues been cleared in this version of the patch?  Thanks.

Tom Rini

More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list