2.4 versus 2.6 patches

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Mon Jul 26 14:13:17 EST 2004

On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, [gb2312] Song Sam wrote:
> But 2.4 kernel is still a pet for 8xx,at least.I guess
> many embedded Linux development lean to 2.4 kernel for
> the moment.For Linux kernel hackers,2.4 kernel was
> dead but it is alive for most embedded
> developers.Right? :-)

I cannot speak for 'most embedded developers.'; only those with clue.

I would not consider deploying anything new on 2.4 today; it's just
not a viable, maintainable platform in my opinion.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

More information about the Linuxppc-embedded mailing list