2.4 versus 2.6 patches

[Song Sam]

David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 10:57 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > for most of the folks on this list, i suspect they'd be more
> > interested in patches to a 2.6- style Kconfig file,not a 2.4-style
> > config.in file, correct?
>
> Yes. The 2.4 kernel is dead.

But 2.4 kernel is still a pet for 8xx,at least.I guess
many embedded Linux development lean to 2.4 kernel for
the moment.For Linux kernel hackers,2.4 kernel was
dead but it is alive for most embedded
developers.Right? :-)

Best regards,

Sam

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/