Problems w/ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MPC8xx_IDE

[Steven Scholz]

Tom,

>>>>So which is the BK tree to use:
>>>>linuxppc_2_4_devel or linuxppc-2.4 ???
>
> Aside from possible changes to match upstream subsystem rewrites (such
> as IDE) there hasn't been any changes in linuxppc-2.4 specific to 8xx
> that didn't happen in 2_4_devel.
>
>>http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml calls linuxppc_2_4_devel the
>>"old PPC development tree" !?
>
> That's correct.  It's becoming more of a pain to maintain or own set of
> trees to track 2.4 when Marcelo uses BK as well.

I suppose we need both trees. Otherwise you would have got rid of one. Right? :o)

Steven


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/