Preemptive Kernel and MPC8xx ???
jjboor at aimsys.nl
Thu Nov 27 03:23:06 EST 2003
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 16:08, Steven Scholz wrote:
> Marius Groeger wrote:
> > AFAIK, you can pretty much drop the low-latency patch in favor of
> > using the lock-breaking patch. It is also available from Robert Love
> > at the cited home page.
> Rob Love wrote me:
> >>Is it correct that your lock-break does basicly the same as Andrew Morton's
> >>low-latency patches? Where is the big difference?
> > Yes, basically the same thing. Lock-break is a version of low-latency
> > that is "optimized" for use with the preemptive kernel.
> > You might as well just use low-latency, as Andrew is keeping that more
> > up to date.
> And that's what I noticed when looking and the download pages...
> That leaves three options:
> > (a) Use only preempt-kernel
> > (b) Use only low-latency
> > (c) Use preempt-kernel + low-latency
Yes, I use (c)
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded