Caching in the MPC107
Mark A. Greer
mgreer at mvista.com
Wed Sep 11 03:03:48 EST 2002
Adrian Cox wrote:
> I think the problem was only visible because the pcnet32 device polls a
> descriptor small enough to get cached in the MPC107, and no other PCI
> master is active to read this cache. I don't currently have access to a
> Sandpoint X3 to test this out on.
>
> The problem seems to be a logical consequence of the documented and
> correct behaviour of the MPC107 and the 7450 family: a PCI read causes
> the MPC107 to cache the line, and the 7450 to mark the line shared. As
> _PAGE_COHERENT is not set, the 7450 does not produce an address only
> transaction when it writes to the line and changes it back from shared
> to modified. The physical evidence was using the scope to see a PCI read
> go into the MPC107, and the MPC107 respond without any cycles on the 60x
> bus.
Adrian,
I think I understand what you're saying. The biggest question that comes to
my mind, though, is whether this is a problem on many of the other
hostbridges? Most of the newer bridges will buffer a cacheline or two. Is
this a wider issue than just the 107?
Mark
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list