Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Dec 14 02:16:43 EST 2002
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 07:26:02AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote:
> >
> > Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the
> > wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when
> > trying to find where the working trees are.
> >
> > } The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II development system,
> > } based on the 405LP processor. For now this is just the core support,
> > } more drivers coming soon. Are there any objections, or suggestions
> > } for doing things better before I commit this to linuxppc_2_4_devel?
> > }
>
> This brings up some really good questions. I have support for three new
> platforms based on the _2_4_devel tree which I'd like to get submitted
> soon [so far, I've just been following along] So,
> * Which tree should be best for new development/ports/etc?
The _2_4_devel tree at the moment, since that still has generally better
infrastructure for non-pmacs :) I would also like to see a patch
against the current linuxppc-2.5 tree as well. It doesn't have to be as
well tested as the 2_4_devel version, and if the tree as a whole doesn't
compile at the time, make a/b/c.o is actually legal in 2.5 so just make
sure your changes still compile.
> * What's the best process for proposing changes? I've seen many
> patches come along on this list, but it's not clear to me if/when
> they made it to any particular tree.
If you aren't already on the linuxppc-commit at source.mvista.com list, you
might want to join that. If a change makes it into any of the
linuxppc_* lists, a msg gets sent there. If you want to propose a
change cc relevant people (generally Paul and / or myself) and send it
to the linuxppc-dev and / or linuxppc-embedded lists. Someone will
speak up, even if it's only me to say I'm too busy today. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list