Support for Arctic platform (405LP based)
Gary Thomas
gary at mlbassoc.com
Sat Dec 14 01:26:02 EST 2002
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 21:51, Cort Dougan wrote:
>
> Would you be able to commit them to _2_4 instead so they're not in the
> wildly divergent _2_4_devel tree? That would definitely be handy when
> trying to find where the working trees are.
>
> } The patch below adds support for IBM's Arctic-II development system,
> } based on the 405LP processor. For now this is just the core support,
> } more drivers coming soon. Are there any objections, or suggestions
> } for doing things better before I commit this to linuxppc_2_4_devel?
> }
This brings up some really good questions. I have support for three new
platforms based on the _2_4_devel tree which I'd like to get submitted
soon [so far, I've just been following along] So,
* Which tree should be best for new development/ports/etc?
* What's the best process for proposing changes? I've seen many
patches come along on this list, but it's not clear to me if/when
they made it to any particular tree.
Thanks.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas |
MLB Associates | Consulting for the
+1 (970) 229-1963 | Embedded world
http://www.mlbassoc.com/ |
email: <gary at mlbassoc.com> |
gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc
------------------------------------------------------------
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded
mailing list