Minilibc works better than Library Optimizer
iluri at fagorautomation.es
Fri Apr 19 16:13:12 EST 2002
I have rebuild libc library to run busybox and the result is a libc of 595
k. For a simple aplication like Hello World the result is a libc of 477 k.
The libc without optimization it has 1.2 M.
De: Kurt Wall [SMTP:kurt.wall at timesys.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 18 de abril de 2002 20:27
Para: IGOR LURI
Asunto: Re: Minilibc works better than Library Optimizer
An unnamed source, IGOR LURI, told us:
> Hi all,
> I have waste a lot of time with Library Optimizer and I dont have
> with it. The glibc optimized with this tool doesn't work to me.
> have found another tool named MINILIBC that works fine. This tool
> downloaded from
> I have proobed with glibc-2.2.3 and works fine, I recomend to use
> instead of library optimizer.
What were the results? What were the savings?
Future looks spotty. You will spill soup in late evening.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-embedded