[PATCH RESEND 1/2] powerpc/ps3: Drop redundant result assignment
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at oss.qualcomm.com
Wed Mar 18 23:03:03 AEDT 2026
On 18/03/2026 12:58, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 12:54:30PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 18/03/2026 12:51, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 02:08:24PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> Return value of ps3_start_probe_thread() is not used, so code can be
>>>> simplified to fix W=1 clang warnings:
>>>>
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/ps3/device-init.c:953:6: error: variable 'result' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>>
>>> And this is exactly why -Werror is harmful. A boring harmless warning
>>> turned into a build break :-(
>>
>> -Werror does not matter here. We do not want warnings either, assuming
>> of course they are correct.
>>
>> So if this warning is correct, then patch should be applied and WERROR
>> is irrelevant.
>
> The build is broken. -Werror is positively harmful.
>
> Yes, you want the warnings fixed, but maybe something else has priority
> right now?
What do you mean? This is waiting on the list for long time - note that
it is a resend - so if warning is correct, for how long it should wait
to get to the "priority" box?
And why anything needs even the priority here? Why priority has to be
discussed, especially for some legacy (I think?) code? Why correct
patches cannot be simply applied after some time/review?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list