[PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Sync tools and kernel headers for v6.11

[Namhyung Kim]

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 8:39 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 9 Aug 2024, at 12:14 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:14:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 7 Aug 2024, at 11:42 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello folks,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 03:50:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the usual sync up in header files we keep in tools directory.
> >>>> I put a file to give the reason of this work and not to repeat it in
> >>>> every commit message.  The changes will be carried in the perf-tools
> >>>> tree.
> >>>
> >>> Could you please double check what's in the tmp.perf-tools branch at the
> >>> perf-tools tree so I don't break build and perf trace for arm64, powerpc
> >>> and s390?  It has this patchset + arm64 unistd header revert (according
> >>> to the discussion on patch 6/10) on top of v6.11-rc2.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Namhyung
> >> Hi Namhyung,
> >>
> >> Can you please point to the tree. I checked in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git as well as https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git , but didn’t find the changes. May be I am missing something. I am trying to check the build in powerpc.
> >
> > Oh, sorry about that.  It's in:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git
> >
> > (no -next at the end)
>
> Hi,
>
> I did compile test on powerpc and results are good.
>
> Tested-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks for doing this!
Namhyung