[PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Sync tools and kernel headers for v6.11

[Athira Rajeev]

> On 9 Aug 2024, at 12:14 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:14:12PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 7 Aug 2024, at 11:42 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello folks,
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 03:50:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> This is the usual sync up in header files we keep in tools directory.
>>>> I put a file to give the reason of this work and not to repeat it in
>>>> every commit message.  The changes will be carried in the perf-tools
>>>> tree.
>>> 
>>> Could you please double check what's in the tmp.perf-tools branch at the
>>> perf-tools tree so I don't break build and perf trace for arm64, powerpc
>>> and s390?  It has this patchset + arm64 unistd header revert (according
>>> to the discussion on patch 6/10) on top of v6.11-rc2.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Namhyung
>> Hi Namhyung,
>> 
>> Can you please point to the tree. I checked in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git as well as https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git , but didn’t find the changes. May be I am missing something. I am trying to check the build in powerpc.
> 
> Oh, sorry about that.  It's in:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools.git
> 
> (no -next at the end)

Hi,

I did compile test on powerpc and results are good. 

Tested-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks
Athira
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung