[PATCH 0/3] Fix for shellcheck issues with version "0.6"

[Athira Rajeev]

> On 28-Sep-2023, at 9:24 AM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:29 PM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 25-Sep-2023, at 1:34 PM, kajoljain <kjain at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9/7/23 22:45, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> From: root <root at ltcden13-lp4.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
>>>> 
>>>> shellcheck was run on perf tool shell scripts s a pre-requisite
>>>> to include a build option for shellcheck discussed here:
>>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg25553.html
>>>> 
>>>> And fixes were added for the coding/formatting issues in
>>>> two patchsets:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230613164145.50488-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230709182800.53002-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>>>> 
>>>> Three additional issues are observed with shellcheck "0.6" and
>>>> this patchset covers those. With this patchset,
>>>> 
>>>> # for F in $(find tests/shell/ -perm -o=x -name '*.sh'); do shellcheck -S warning $F; done
>>>> # echo $?
>>>> 0
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Patchset looks good to me.
>>> 
>>> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain at linux.ibm.com>
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kajol Jain
>>> 
>> 
>> Hi Namhyunbg,
>> 
>> Can you please check for this patchset also
> 
> Sure, it's applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!

Thanks Namhyung

Athira