[PATCH 0/3] Fix for shellcheck issues with version "0.6"

[Namhyung Kim]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:29 PM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 25-Sep-2023, at 1:34 PM, kajoljain <kjain at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/7/23 22:45, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> From: root <root at ltcden13-lp4.aus.stglabs.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> shellcheck was run on perf tool shell scripts s a pre-requisite
> >> to include a build option for shellcheck discussed here:
> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-perf-users/msg25553.html
> >>
> >> And fixes were added for the coding/formatting issues in
> >> two patchsets:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230613164145.50488-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20230709182800.53002-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
> >>
> >> Three additional issues are observed with shellcheck "0.6" and
> >> this patchset covers those. With this patchset,
> >>
> >> # for F in $(find tests/shell/ -perm -o=x -name '*.sh'); do shellcheck -S warning $F; done
> >> # echo $?
> >> 0
> >>
> >
> > Patchset looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain at linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kajol Jain
> >
>
> Hi Namhyunbg,
>
> Can you please check for this patchset also

Sure, it's applied to perf-tools-next, thanks!