[PATCH 15/34] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory
Xiaoyao Li
xiaoyao.li at intel.com
Fri Nov 10 12:53:41 AEDT 2023
On 11/6/2023 12:30 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com>
>
> Introduce an ioctl(), KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD, to allow creating file-based
> memory that is tied to a specific KVM virtual machine and whose primary
> purpose is to serve guest memory.
>
> A guest-first memory subsystem allows for optimizations and enhancements
> that are kludgy or outright infeasible to implement/support in a generic
> memory subsystem. With guest_memfd, guest protections and mapping sizes
> are fully decoupled from host userspace mappings. E.g. KVM currently
> doesn't support mapping memory as writable in the guest without it also
> being writable in host userspace, as KVM's ABI uses VMA protections to
> define the allow guest protection. Userspace can fudge this by
> establishing two mappings, a writable mapping for the guest and readable
> one for itself, but that’s suboptimal on multiple fronts.
>
> Similarly, KVM currently requires the guest mapping size to be a strict
> subset of the host userspace mapping size, e.g. KVM doesn’t support
> creating a 1GiB guest mapping unless userspace also has a 1GiB guest
> mapping. Decoupling the mappings sizes would allow userspace to precisely
> map only what is needed without impacting guest performance, e.g. to
> harden against unintentional accesses to guest memory.
>
> Decoupling guest and userspace mappings may also allow for a cleaner
> alternative to high-granularity mappings for HugeTLB, which has reached a
> bit of an impasse and is unlikely to ever be merged.
>
> A guest-first memory subsystem also provides clearer line of sight to
> things like a dedicated memory pool (for slice-of-hardware VMs) and
> elimination of "struct page" (for offload setups where userspace _never_
> needs to mmap() guest memory).
>
> More immediately, being able to map memory into KVM guests without mapping
> said memory into the host is critical for Confidential VMs (CoCo VMs), the
> initial use case for guest_memfd. While AMD's SEV and Intel's TDX prevent
> untrusted software from reading guest private data by encrypting guest
> memory with a key that isn't usable by the untrusted host, projects such
> as Protected KVM (pKVM) provide confidentiality and integrity *without*
> relying on memory encryption. And with SEV-SNP and TDX, accessing guest
> private memory can be fatal to the host, i.e. KVM must be prevent host
> userspace from accessing guest memory irrespective of hardware behavior.
>
> Attempt #1 to support CoCo VMs was to add a VMA flag to mark memory as
> being mappable only by KVM (or a similarly enlightened kernel subsystem).
> That approach was abandoned largely due to it needing to play games with
> PROT_NONE to prevent userspace from accessing guest memory.
>
> Attempt #2 to was to usurp PG_hwpoison to prevent the host from mapping
> guest private memory into userspace, but that approach failed to meet
> several requirements for software-based CoCo VMs, e.g. pKVM, as the kernel
> wouldn't easily be able to enforce a 1:1 page:guest association, let alone
> a 1:1 pfn:gfn mapping. And using PG_hwpoison does not work for memory
> that isn't backed by 'struct page', e.g. if devices gain support for
> exposing encrypted memory regions to guests.
>
> Attempt #3 was to extend the memfd() syscall and wrap shmem to provide
> dedicated file-based guest memory. That approach made it as far as v10
> before feedback from Hugh Dickins and Christian Brauner (and others) led
> to it demise.
>
> Hugh's objection was that piggybacking shmem made no sense for KVM's use
> case as KVM didn't actually *want* the features provided by shmem. I.e.
> KVM was using memfd() and shmem to avoid having to manage memory directly,
> not because memfd() and shmem were the optimal solution, e.g. things like
> read/write/mmap in shmem were dead weight.
>
> Christian pointed out flaws with implementing a partial overlay (wrapping
> only _some_ of shmem), e.g. poking at inode_operations or super_operations
> would show shmem stuff, but address_space_operations and file_operations
> would show KVM's overlay. Paraphrashing heavily, Christian suggested KVM
> stop being lazy and create a proper API.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201020061859.18385-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210416154106.23721-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210824005248.200037-1-seanjc@google.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211111141352.26311-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221202061347.1070246-1-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ff5c5b97-acdf-9745-ebe5-c6609dd6322e@google.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230418-anfallen-irdisch-6993a61be10b@brauner
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZEM5Zq8oo+xnApW9@google.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230306191944.GA15773@monkey
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZII1p8ZHlHaQ3dDl@casper.infradead.org
> Cc: Fuad Tabba <tabba at google.com>
> Cc: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve at google.com>
> Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng at google.com>
> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko at kernel.org>
> Cc: Maciej Szmigiero <mail at maciej.szmigiero.name>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka at suse.cz>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david at redhat.com>
> Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret at google.com>
> Cc: Michael Roth <michael.roth at amd.com>
> Cc: Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com>
> Cc: Liam Merwick <liam.merwick at oracle.com>
> Cc: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at gmail.com>
> Co-developed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov at linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang at linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng at linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng at google.com>
> Co-developed-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
> Co-developed-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth at amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc at google.com>
> Message-Id: <20231027182217.3615211-17-seanjc at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 69 ++++-
> fs/anon_inodes.c | 1 +
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 48 +++
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 15 +-
> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 4 +
> virt/kvm/Makefile.kvm | 1 +
> virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 538 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 59 +++-
> virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h | 26 ++
> 9 files changed, 754 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 083ed507e200..6d681f45969e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6202,6 +6202,15 @@ superset of the features supported by the system.
> :Parameters: struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2 (in)
> :Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
>
> +KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 is an extension to KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION that
> +allows mapping guest_memfd memory into a guest. All fields shared with
> +KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION identically. Userspace can set KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD
> +in flags to have KVM bind the memory region to a given guest_memfd range of
> +[guest_memfd_offset, guest_memfd_offset + memory_size]. The target guest_memfd
> +must point at a file created via KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD on the current VM, and
> +the target range must not be bound to any other memory region. All standard
> +bounds checks apply (use common sense).
> +
> ::
>
> struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2 {
> @@ -6210,9 +6219,24 @@ superset of the features supported by the system.
> __u64 guest_phys_addr;
> __u64 memory_size; /* bytes */
> __u64 userspace_addr; /* start of the userspace allocated memory */
> + __u64 guest_memfd_offset;
> + __u32 guest_memfd;
> + __u32 pad1;
> + __u64 pad2[14];
> };
>
> -See KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION.
> +A KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD region _must_ have a valid guest_memfd (private memory) and
> +userspace_addr (shared memory). However, "valid" for userspace_addr simply
> +means that the address itself must be a legal userspace address. The backing
> +mapping for userspace_addr is not required to be valid/populated at the time of
> +KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2, e.g. shared memory can be lazily mapped/allocated
> +on-demand.
> +
> +When mapping a gfn into the guest, KVM selects shared vs. private, i.e consumes
> +userspace_addr vs. guest_memfd, based on the gfn's KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE
> +state. At VM creation time, all memory is shared, i.e. the PRIVATE attribute
> +is '0' for all gfns. Userspace can control whether memory is shared/private by
> +toggling KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE via KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES as needed.
>
> 4.141 KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> -------------------------------
> @@ -6250,6 +6274,49 @@ the state of a gfn/page as needed.
>
> The "flags" field is reserved for future extensions and must be '0'.
>
> +4.142 KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD
> +----------------------------
> +
> +:Capability: KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD
> +:Architectures: none
> +:Type: vm ioctl
> +:Parameters: struct kvm_create_guest_memfd(in)
> +:Returns: 0 on success, <0 on error
> +
> +KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD creates an anonymous file and returns a file descriptor
> +that refers to it. guest_memfd files are roughly analogous to files created
> +via memfd_create(), e.g. guest_memfd files live in RAM, have volatile storage,
> +and are automatically released when the last reference is dropped. Unlike
> +"regular" memfd_create() files, guest_memfd files are bound to their owning
> +virtual machine (see below), cannot be mapped, read, or written by userspace,
> +and cannot be resized (guest_memfd files do however support PUNCH_HOLE).
> +
> +::
> +
> + struct kvm_create_guest_memfd {
> + __u64 size;
> + __u64 flags;
> + __u64 reserved[6];
> + };
> +
> +Conceptually, the inode backing a guest_memfd file represents physical memory,
> +i.e. is coupled to the virtual machine as a thing, not to a "struct kvm". The
> +file itself, which is bound to a "struct kvm", is that instance's view of the
> +underlying memory, e.g. effectively provides the translation of guest addresses
> +to host memory. This allows for use cases where multiple KVM structures are
> +used to manage a single virtual machine, e.g. when performing intrahost
> +migration of a virtual machine.
> +
> +KVM currently only supports mapping guest_memfd via KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2,
> +and more specifically via the guest_memfd and guest_memfd_offset fields in
> +"struct kvm_userspace_memory_region2", where guest_memfd_offset is the offset
> +into the guest_memfd instance. For a given guest_memfd file, there can be at
> +most one mapping per page, i.e. binding multiple memory regions to a single
> +guest_memfd range is not allowed (any number of memory regions can be bound to
> +a single guest_memfd file, but the bound ranges must not overlap).
> +
> +See KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 for additional details.
> +
> 5. The kvm_run structure
> ========================
>
> diff --git a/fs/anon_inodes.c b/fs/anon_inodes.c
> index 3d4a27f8b4fe..6f3d31b4d1e3 100644
> --- a/fs/anon_inodes.c
> +++ b/fs/anon_inodes.c
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ struct file *anon_inode_create_getfile(const char *name,
> return __anon_inode_getfile(name, fops, priv, flags,
> context_inode, true);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(anon_inode_create_getfile);
>
> static int __anon_inode_getfd(const char *name,
> const struct file_operations *fops,
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 68a144cb7dbc..a6de526c0426 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -589,8 +589,20 @@ struct kvm_memory_slot {
> u32 flags;
> short id;
> u16 as_id;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> + struct {
> + struct file __rcu *file;
> + pgoff_t pgoff;
> + } gmem;
> +#endif
> };
>
> +static inline bool kvm_slot_can_be_private(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> + return slot && (slot->flags & KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD);
> +}
> +
maybe we can move this block and ...
<snip>
> @@ -2355,6 +2379,30 @@ bool kvm_arch_pre_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
> bool kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM) &&
> + kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES */
this block to Patch 18?
<snip>
> @@ -4844,6 +4875,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
> case KVM_CAP_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES:
> return kvm_supported_mem_attributes(kvm);
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> + case KVM_CAP_GUEST_MEMFD:
> + return !kvm || kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm);
> #endif
> default:
> break;
> @@ -5277,6 +5312,18 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> case KVM_GET_STATS_FD:
> r = kvm_vm_ioctl_get_stats_fd(kvm);
> break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> + case KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD: {
> + struct kvm_create_guest_memfd guest_memfd;
Do we need a guard of below?
r = -EINVAL;
if (!kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm))
goto out;
> + r = -EFAULT;
> + if (copy_from_user(&guest_memfd, argp, sizeof(guest_memfd)))
> + goto out;
> +
> + r = kvm_gmem_create(kvm, &guest_memfd);
> + break;
> + }
> +#endif
> default:
> r = kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(filp, ioctl, arg);
> }
> @@ -6409,6 +6456,8 @@ int kvm_init(unsigned vcpu_size, unsigned vcpu_align, struct module *module)
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(r))
> goto err_vfio;
>
> + kvm_gmem_init(module);
> +
> /*
> * Registration _must_ be the very last thing done, as this exposes
> * /dev/kvm to userspace, i.e. all infrastructure must be setup!
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h b/virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h
> index 180f1a09e6ba..ecefc7ec51af 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_mm.h
> @@ -37,4 +37,30 @@ static inline void gfn_to_pfn_cache_invalidate_start(struct kvm *kvm,
> }
> #endif /* HAVE_KVM_PFNCACHE */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM
> +void kvm_gmem_init(struct module *module);
> +int kvm_gmem_create(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_create_guest_memfd *args);
> +int kvm_gmem_bind(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> + unsigned int fd, loff_t offset);
> +void kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> +#else
> +static inline void kvm_gmem_init(struct module *module)
> +{
> +
> +}
> +
> +static inline int kvm_gmem_bind(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> + unsigned int fd, loff_t offset)
> +{
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kvm_gmem_unbind(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM */
> +
> #endif /* __KVM_MM_H__ */
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list