[PATCH] misc: ocxl: fix possible name leak in ocxl_file_register_afu()
Frederic Barrat
fbarrat at linux.ibm.com
Mon Nov 14 23:04:39 AEDT 2022
On 14/11/2022 12:46, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022/11/14 19:23, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/11/2022 15:59, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>>> If device_register() returns error in ocxl_file_register_afu(),
>>> the name allocated by dev_set_name() need be freed. As comment
>>> of device_register() says, it should use put_device() to give
>>> up the reference in the error path. So fix this by calling
>>> put_device(), then the name can be freed in kobject_cleanup(),
>>> and info is freed in info_release().
>>>
>>> Fixes: 75ca758adbaf ("ocxl: Create a clear delineation between ocxl
>>> backend & frontend")
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang at huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 7 +++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
>>> index d46dba2df5a1..452d5777a0e4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
>>> @@ -541,8 +541,11 @@ int ocxl_file_register_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
>>> goto err_put;
>>> rc = device_register(&info->dev);
>>> - if (rc)
>>> - goto err_put;
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> + free_minor(info);
>>> + put_device(&info->dev);
>>> + return rc;
>>> + }
>>
>>
>> While I agree that a put_device() is needed on that error path, the
>> fix above is not correct as it forgets to release the afu reference
>> and the memory allocated in info. That was taken care of by the jump
>> to the err_put label, so it should be kept. Something like:
>>
>> - if (rc)
>> + if (rc) {
>> + put_device((&info->dev);
>> goto err_put;
>> + }
> The 'info' and the reference is released in info_release().
>
> Here is call chain:
> put_device()
> kobject_release()
> kobject_cleanup()
> device_release()
> info_release()
>
> static void info_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct ocxl_file_info *info = container_of(dev, struct
> ocxl_file_info, dev);
>
> ocxl_afu_put(info->afu);
> kfree(info);
> }
> So it don't need jump to the error label in this case.
You're right, I went too fast and the patch is correct.
So:
Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat at linux.ibm.com>
Fred
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list