[PATCH] misc: ocxl: fix possible name leak in ocxl_file_register_afu()
Yang Yingliang
yangyingliang at huawei.com
Mon Nov 14 22:46:38 AEDT 2022
Hi,
On 2022/11/14 19:23, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/2022 15:59, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> If device_register() returns error in ocxl_file_register_afu(),
>> the name allocated by dev_set_name() need be freed. As comment
>> of device_register() says, it should use put_device() to give
>> up the reference in the error path. So fix this by calling
>> put_device(), then the name can be freed in kobject_cleanup(),
>> and info is freed in info_release().
>>
>> Fixes: 75ca758adbaf ("ocxl: Create a clear delineation between ocxl
>> backend & frontend")
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
>> index d46dba2df5a1..452d5777a0e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
>> @@ -541,8 +541,11 @@ int ocxl_file_register_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
>> goto err_put;
>> rc = device_register(&info->dev);
>> - if (rc)
>> - goto err_put;
>> + if (rc) {
>> + free_minor(info);
>> + put_device(&info->dev);
>> + return rc;
>> + }
>
>
> While I agree that a put_device() is needed on that error path, the
> fix above is not correct as it forgets to release the afu reference
> and the memory allocated in info. That was taken care of by the jump
> to the err_put label, so it should be kept. Something like:
>
> - if (rc)
> + if (rc) {
> + put_device((&info->dev);
> goto err_put;
> + }
The 'info' and the reference is released in info_release().
Here is call chain:
put_device()
kobject_release()
kobject_cleanup()
device_release()
info_release()
static void info_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct ocxl_file_info *info = container_of(dev, struct
ocxl_file_info, dev);
ocxl_afu_put(info->afu);
kfree(info);
}
So it don't need jump to the error label in this case.
Thanks,
Yang
>
>
> Fred
>
> .
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list