[PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc: sstep: Fix load and update emulation
Naveen N. Rao
naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Mar 4 03:31:27 AEDT 2021
On 2021/03/01 08:37PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I didn't see this until now, almost a month later, sorry about that :-)
No problem.
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 01:57:53PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> > On 2021/02/03 03:17PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > Power8 does:
> > >
> > > Load with Update Instructions (RA = 0)
> > > EA is placed into R0.
> > > Load with Update Instructions (RA = RT)
> > > EA is placed into RT. The storage operand addressed by EA is
> > > accessed, but the data returned by the load is discarded.
> >
> > I'm actually not seeing that. This is what I am testing with:
> > li 8,0xaaa
> > mr 6,1
> > std 8,64(6)
> > #ldu 6,64(6)
> > .long 0xe8c60041
> >
> > And, r6 always ends up with 0xaea. It changes with the value I put into
> > r6 though.
>
> That is exactly the behaviour specified for p8. 0aaa+0040=0aea.
>
> > Granted, this is all up in the air, but it does look like there is more
> > going on and the value isn't the EA or the value at the address.
>
> That *is* the EA. The EA is the address the insn does the access at.
I'm probably missing something here. 0xaaa is the value I stored at an
offset of 64 bytes from the stack pointer (r1 is copied into r6). In the
ldu instruction above, the EA is 64(r6), which should translate to
r1+64. The data returned by the load would be 0xaaa, which should be
discarded per the description you provided above. So, I would expect to
see a 0xc0.. address in r6.
In fact, this looks to be the behavior documented for P9:
> > Power9 does:
> >
> > Load with Update Instructions (RA = 0)
> > EA is placed into R0.
> > Load with Update Instructions (RA = RT)
> > The storage operand addressed by EA is accessed. The
> > displacement
> > field is added to the data returned by the load and placed into
> > RT.
- Naveen
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list